PhysSandbox
Classical MechanicsWaves & SoundElectricity & MagnetismOptics & LightGravity & OrbitsLabs
🌙Astronomy & The Sky🌡️Thermodynamics🌍Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience📐Math Visualization🔧Engineering🧪Chemistry

Related simulators

Similar topics nearby (including related fields) — or browse all 50 in Optics & Light.

View category →
NewSchool

Brownian Motion

Launch Simulator

Heavy particle with random kicks and friction; trail and running ⟨r²⟩ vs time.

NewUniversity / research

Gaussian Beam & q-Parameter

Launch Simulator

Waist w₀, Rayleigh range z_R, Gouy phase ζ(z), and ABCD propagation through a thin lens; w(z) and q at observation plane.

NewUniversity / research

Fabry–Pérot Cavity / Etalon

Launch Simulator

Airy transmission T(L), finesse F, free spectral range FSR = λ/(2n), linewidth ΔL ≈ FSR/F; animated cavity-length scan.

NewUniversity / research

Mach–Zehnder Interferometer

Launch Simulator

Two-beam recombination; I ∝ cos²(πΔ/λ) vs one-arm OPD; schematic + fringe plot.

NewUniversity / research

Sagnac (Ring) Interferometer

Launch Simulator

Δφ ∝ Ω·A/λ for counter-propagating beams in a rotating loop — optical gyro idea.

NewSchool

Optical Bench (sandbox)

Launch Simulator

Up to 4 elements: thin lenses, vertical mirrors, wedge δ; paraxial ray trace.

PhysSandbox

Interactive physics, chemistry, and engineering simulators for students, teachers, and curious minds.

Physics

  • Classical Mechanics
  • Waves & Sound
  • Electricity & Magnetism

Science

  • Optics & Light
  • Gravity & Orbits
  • Astronomy & The Sky

More

  • Thermodynamics
  • Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience
  • Math Visualization
  • Engineering
  • Chemistry

© 2026 PhysSandbox. Free interactive science simulators.

PrivacyTermsContact
Home/Optics & Light/Optical Tweezers (Gradient Trap)

Optical Tweezers (Gradient Trap)

Gaussian trap U(r), stiffness k ∝ P/w₀², overdamped Langevin bead with Stokes drag and thermal Brownian jitter; ⟨r²⟩ trace.

Optical trap

80 mW
0.55 µm
0.5 µm
295 K
1 mPa·s
1×

Toy gradient-force trap: I(r)∝exp(−2r²/w₀²), U=−U₀I/I₀, harmonic k≈4U₀/w₀² at focus. Bead follows overdamped Langevin with Stokes drag γ=6πηR and thermal displacement noise √(2k_BTΔt/γ).

Measured values

Stiffness k1.54 pN/µm
Trap depth U₀0.12 pN·µm
Drag γ9.42e-3 pN·s/µm
Thermal step σ0.042 µm

Live graphs

About this model

Optical tweezers use the intensity gradient of a focused Gaussian laser beam to trap micrometer-scale dielectric beads. In this toy model the beam profile is I(r) ∝ exp(−2r²/w₀²) and the effective potential is U(r) = −U₀ exp(−2r²/w₀²) with trap depth U₀ scaling with laser power P and stiffness k ≈ 4U₀/w₀² near the focus. The bead follows overdamped Langevin dynamics dx = (F_grad/γ)dt + √(2k_BTdt/γ)N(0,1) with Stokes drag γ = 6πηR. The top view shows the trap intensity, waist circle, bead trajectory, and running mean square displacement ⟨r²⟩; sliders adjust power, waist, bead size, temperature, and viscosity. This is a scalar gradient-force cartoon, not a full vector Mie scattering or scattering-force calculation.

Who it's for: Undergraduate biophysics and optics labs studying laser trapping, Brownian motion in harmonic wells, and single-molecule mechanics.

Key terms

  • Optical tweezers
  • Gradient force
  • Gaussian beam
  • Optical trap stiffness
  • Brownian motion
  • Langevin equation
  • Stokes drag
  • Mean square displacement

How it works

Optical tweezers toy model: Gaussian trap, bead potential U(r), stiffness k, and Brownian jitter in overdamped Langevin dynamics.

Key equations

U(r) = −U₀ exp(−2r²/w₀²) · k = 4U₀/w₀²
dx = (F_grad/γ)dt + √(2k_BT dt/γ) N(0,1)

Frequently asked questions

Why is the potential negative at the center?
We plot U = −U₀ I/I₀ so the force F = −∇U points toward the intensity maximum at r = 0, mimicking a dielectric bead attracted to the bright focus.
How does stiffness depend on power and waist?
Near the focus, k ≈ 4U₀/w₀² with U₀ ∝ P in this toy model: higher power tightens the trap; a larger waist weakens confinement for fixed power.
What causes the jitter?
Thermal kicks from the surrounding fluid compete with the restoring force. Higher temperature or lower drag (smaller bead, lower viscosity) increases Brownian motion.
What is left out?
Scattering force, beam polarization, interface heating, non-Gaussian beams, 3D axial trap structure, and photodamage are not modeled.