PhysSandbox
Classical MechanicsWaves & SoundElectricity & MagnetismOptics & LightGravity & OrbitsLabs
🌙Astronomy & The Sky🌡️Thermodynamics🌍Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience📐Math Visualization🔧Engineering🧪Chemistry

More from Astronomy & The Sky

Other simulators in this category — or see all 45.

View category →
NewSchool

Seasons & Axial Tilt

Obliquity ~23.4°: declination model vs day of year and noon sun altitude at latitude.

Launch Simulator
NewSchool

Single-Layer Climate (Toy)

S, α, ε: T_eff vs T_surface from gray-slab balance — intuition only.

Launch Simulator
NewSchool

Moon Phases

Sun–Earth–Moon geometry and synodic cycle; lit fraction from phase angle.

Launch Simulator
NewSchool

Solar Eclipse Geometry

Sun–Moon–Earth: angular sizes, umbra and penumbra cones, orbit tilt.

Launch Simulator
NewSchool

Lunar Eclipse Geometry

Sun–Earth–Moon: Earth’s shadow on the Moon; total, partial, and penumbral (schematic colors).

Launch Simulator
NewSchool

Moon: Tidal Locking

Synchronous rotation: same lunar face toward Earth as it orbits.

Launch Simulator
PhysSandbox

Interactive physics, chemistry, and engineering simulators for students, teachers, and curious minds.

Physics

  • Classical Mechanics
  • Waves & Sound
  • Electricity & Magnetism

Science

  • Optics & Light
  • Gravity & Orbits
  • Astronomy & The Sky

More

  • Thermodynamics
  • Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience
  • Math Visualization
  • Engineering
  • Chemistry

© 2026 PhysSandbox. Free interactive science simulators.

PrivacyTermsContact
Home/Astronomy & The Sky/Nuclear Binding Curve

Nuclear Binding Curve

The Nuclear Binding Curve simulator visualizes one of the most fundamental relationships in nuclear physics: the average binding energy per nucleon (B/A) as a function of the mass number (A). This curve, derived from empirical data, reveals why some nuclei are more stable than others. The model is built on the concept of nuclear binding energy, which is the energy required to disassemble a nucleus into its constituent protons and neutrons. This energy is calculated using Einstein's mass-energy equivalence principle, E=mc², where the mass defect (the difference between the mass of the separated nucleons and the actual mass of the nucleus) is converted into energy. The simulator plots B/A, where B is the total binding energy, allowing users to see the characteristic peak near iron-56 (⁵⁶Fe). This peak is the key to understanding nuclear energy: nuclei lighter than iron can release energy through fusion, moving up the curve toward the peak, while nuclei heavier than iron can release energy through fission, moving down the curve toward the peak. The model simplifies the complex quantum mechanical details of the nuclear force into this empirical curve, neglecting shell effects and the fine structure seen in real data. By interacting with the simulator, students learn to interpret the curve's shape, identify the most tightly bound nuclei, and predict whether a given nuclear process will be exothermic (energy-releasing) or endothermic (energy-absorbing) based on its position relative to the maximum.

Who it's for: High school and introductory undergraduate physics students studying nuclear physics, as well as educators in astronomy and astrophysics courses explaining stellar nucleosynthesis and energy sources.

Key terms

  • Binding Energy per Nucleon
  • Mass Defect
  • Nuclear Fusion
  • Nuclear Fission
  • Mass-Energy Equivalence
  • Iron Peak
  • Stellar Nucleosynthesis
  • Nuclear Stability

Mass number

56

Heavy nuclei can release energy by fission (toward the peak) and very light ones by fusion — both move toward higher B/A (this curve is only qualitative).

Measured values

B/A (model)8.21 MeV

How it works

The iron–nickel neighborhood is near the maximum of binding per nucleon in stable matter — why stars burn up to those ashes.

Frequently asked questions

Why does the curve peak at iron? Doesn't that make iron the 'end point' of nuclear reactions?
Iron-56 and nickel-62 have the highest binding energy per nucleon, meaning they are the most tightly bound and stable nuclei. This peak represents a minimum in the system's energy. In stars, fusion processes create elements up to iron because doing so releases energy. Creating elements heavier than iron through fusion requires an input of energy, which is why it only occurs in extreme events like supernovae. So, while iron is an end point for energy-producing fusion in stellar cores, heavier elements are formed through other processes.
If fusion releases energy for light nuclei, why is it so difficult to achieve on Earth?
Fusion requires bringing positively charged nuclei close enough for the short-range strong nuclear force to overcome their immense electrostatic repulsion (Coulomb barrier). This requires extremely high temperatures and pressures, like those in the core of a star. While the curve shows fusion is energetically favorable, the practical challenge is creating and confining a plasma at temperatures over 100 million degrees Celsius, which is a major focus of current research in projects like ITER.
Does the simulator show that all fission events release energy?
No. The simulator's curve shows that fission is energetically possible (exothermic) only for very heavy nuclei, like uranium or plutonium, which lie far to the right of the peak. Splitting a nucleus like iron, which is at the peak, would require an energy input, making it endothermic. In practice, even for heavy nuclei, fission must also be triggered, often by neutron absorption, to overcome an activation energy barrier.
What is the 'mass defect,' and where does the 'lost' mass go?
The mass defect is the difference between the sum of the masses of an atom's individual protons and neutrons and the atom's actual measured mass. This 'missing' mass is not lost but is converted into binding energy that holds the nucleus together, as described by Einstein's equation E=mc². When a nucleus forms (in fusion) or splits (in fission), changes in this binding energy manifest as the release or absorption of tremendous amounts of energy.