PhysSandbox
Classical MechanicsWaves & SoundElectricity & MagnetismOptics & LightGravity & OrbitsLabs
🌙Astronomy & The Sky🌡️Thermodynamics🌍Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience📐Math Visualization🔧Engineering🧪Chemistry

More from Chemistry

Other simulators in this category — or see all 65.

View category →
NewUniversity / research

Belousov–Zhabotinsky (Excitable)

Launch Simulator

Greenberg–Hastings excitable cellular automaton: target waves and rotating spirals as a qualitative BZ analogue.

NewSchool

Radioactive Decay & Chain

Launch Simulator

N(t) from half-life T₁/₂; optional parent → daughter → stable Bateman ODEs (RK4, normalized).

NewSchool

Le Châtelier Principle (Gas)

Launch Simulator

N₂ + 3H₂ ⇌ 2NH₃: T, V, add/remove species; Q vs K and relaxing mole bars.

NewSchool

VSEPR Molecular Shapes (3D)

Launch Simulator

Bonding vs lone pairs on a central atom: AXₙEₘ notation, electron geometry, and ball–lone-pair model.

NewSchool

Galvanic (Voltaic) Cell

Launch Simulator

Two half-cells, salt bridge, voltmeter; E°cell and Nernst E from ion concentrations (pedagogical E°).

NewSchool

Hess's Law (Enthalpy Paths)

Launch Simulator

Two-step vs direct ΔH on an enthalpy diagram; sum must match declared overall ΔH.

PhysSandbox

Interactive physics, chemistry, and engineering simulators for students, teachers, and curious minds.

Physics

  • Classical Mechanics
  • Waves & Sound
  • Electricity & Magnetism

Science

  • Optics & Light
  • Gravity & Orbits
  • Astronomy & The Sky

More

  • Thermodynamics
  • Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience
  • Math Visualization
  • Engineering
  • Chemistry

© 2026 PhysSandbox. Free interactive science simulators.

PrivacyTermsContact
Home/Chemistry/Polymer Random Coil

Polymer Random Coil

Lattice random walk R_g with Flory exponent ν slider (scaling hint vs Gaussian ν = ½).

Chain

120
0.588

Measured values

R_g (lattice walk)3.53
R_g · (N/120)^(ν−½)3.53

About this model

A polymer chain is modeled as a lattice random walk whose size is summarized by the radius of gyration R_g. A Flory-exponent slider sets the scaling hint R_g ∼ N^ν, comparing the ideal Gaussian coil ν = ½ with swollen or collapsed regimes suggested by different ν. The visualization is a schematic coil on a lattice, not a full molecular-dynamics force field: no explicit solvent particles, no entanglement dynamics, and no chemical detail beyond the scaling picture. You change chain length and ν to see how excluded-volume ideas enlarge the coil relative to a phantom Gaussian walk — core polymer-physics intuition.

Who it's for: Physical chemistry and soft-matter courses introducing ideal chains, Flory theory, and radius of gyration.

Key terms

  • Random coil
  • Radius of gyration
  • Flory exponent
  • Self-avoiding walk
  • Ideal chain
  • Polymer scaling

How it works

2D square-lattice random walk as a cartoon chain; radius of gyration measures spread about the center of mass. The ν slider only rescales R_g for comparison with typical exponents (Gaussian ν = ½ in 2D; good-solvent 3D SAW is often quoted near ν ≈ 0.588 — not reproduced by this 2D lattice model).

Key equations

R_g² = (1/N) Σᵢ |rᵢ − r_cm|² in 2D. The ν slider does not re-simulate a SAW; it only rescales the displayed R_g for classroom comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Why is ν = ½ called Gaussian or ideal?
For a phantom random walk without excluded volume, ⟨R²⟩ ∝ N so the characteristic size scales as N^{1/2}. Real chains in good solvent swell (ν ≈ 0.588 in 3D) because monomers cannot occupy the same space; the slider illustrates that scaling change schematically.
Is R_g the same as end-to-end distance?
No. End-to-end distance R tracks the vector between chain ends; R_g measures the mass distribution about the center of mass. For ideal linear chains they are proportional (R_g² = R²/6), but they remain distinct observables.
Does changing ν redesign the chemistry of the polymer?
In this lab ν is a pedagogical scaling parameter, not a computed exponent from a specific monomer potential. It stands in for solvent quality and excluded volume. Predicting ν from chemistry requires a fuller statistical-mechanics model.