PhysSandbox
Classical MechanicsWaves & SoundElectricity & MagnetismOptics & LightGravity & OrbitsLabs
🌙Astronomy & The Sky🌡️Thermodynamics🌍Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience📐Math Visualization🔧Engineering🧪Chemistry

More from Chemistry

Other simulators in this category — or see all 65.

View category →
NewSchool

Chromatography Column

Launch Simulator

Partition chromatography cartoon: Gaussian bands separate as retention on the stationary phase differs.

NewUniversity / research

Michaelis–Menten Kinetics

Launch Simulator

v vs [S] saturation and Lineweaver–Burk line from slope Km/Vmax and intercept 1/Vmax.

NewSchool

DNA Replication (Schematic)

Launch Simulator

Fork, leading vs lagging strand, Okazaki fragments — static labeled cartoon.

NewSchool

Polymer Random Coil

Launch Simulator

Lattice random walk R_g with Flory exponent ν slider (scaling hint vs Gaussian ν = ½).

NewUniversity / research

Belousov–Zhabotinsky (Excitable)

Launch Simulator

Greenberg–Hastings excitable cellular automaton: target waves and rotating spirals as a qualitative BZ analogue.

NewSchool

Radioactive Decay & Chain

Launch Simulator

N(t) from half-life T₁/₂; optional parent → daughter → stable Bateman ODEs (RK4, normalized).

PhysSandbox

Interactive physics, chemistry, and engineering simulators for students, teachers, and curious minds.

Physics

  • Classical Mechanics
  • Waves & Sound
  • Electricity & Magnetism

Science

  • Optics & Light
  • Gravity & Orbits
  • Astronomy & The Sky

More

  • Thermodynamics
  • Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience
  • Math Visualization
  • Engineering
  • Chemistry

© 2026 PhysSandbox. Free interactive science simulators.

PrivacyTermsContact
Home/Chemistry/Close Packing FCC / BCC / HCP

Close Packing FCC / BCC / HCP

Coordination numbers, maximal packing η, schematic ABC vs AB stacking beside a BCC cubic cell.

Structure

0°

Measured values

Coordination #12
Packing fraction η0.7405
Atoms / conv. cell4

About this model

This simulator compares close-packed crystal structures: face-centered cubic (FCC), hexagonal close-packed (HCP), and body-centered cubic (BCC). It highlights coordination numbers, the maximal packing fraction η, and schematic ABC versus AB layer stacking beside a BCC cubic cell. FCC and HCP both achieve η = π/(3√2) ≈ 0.74 with coordination 12 but differ in stacking sequence; BCC is more open (coordination 8, lower η). The view is geometric and pedagogical: atoms are hard spheres, thermal vibrations and real bonding anisotropy are ignored. You switch among lattices to contrast stacking and packing efficiency — core solid-state and materials-chemistry intuition.

Who it's for: Introductory solid-state chemistry, materials science, and crystallography courses on metallic and ionic packing.

Key terms

  • Close packing
  • FCC
  • HCP
  • BCC
  • Coordination number
  • Packing fraction

How it works

FCC and HCP are two ways to stack close-packed planes with the same coordination (12) and maximal packing fraction η = π√2/6. BCC is denser than simple cubic but not close-packed (η = π√3/8, CN = 8).

Key equations

ABC stacking of hexagonal close-packed planes (…ABCABC…).

Frequently asked questions

Are FCC and HCP equally densely packed?
Yes for hard spheres: both reach η ≈ 0.74 with twelve nearest neighbors. They differ in stacking — ABCABC… (FCC) versus ABAB… (HCP) — which changes symmetry and slip systems, not the ideal packing fraction.
Why include BCC if it is not close-packed?
BCC is common in metals yet has lower packing fraction and coordination 8. Comparing it next to FCC/HCP prevents the misconception that all cubic metals are close-packed and clarifies what ‘close-packed’ specifically means.
Do real crystals match these hard-sphere η values?
Hard-sphere η is an ideal geometric limit. Real atomic radii, directional bonding, and temperature-dependent lattice parameters shift densities; the schematic still correctly ranks FCC/HCP above BCC for sphere packing.