PhysSandbox
Classical MechanicsWaves & SoundElectricity & MagnetismOptics & LightGravity & OrbitsLabs
🌙Astronomy & The Sky🌡️Thermodynamics🌍Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience📐Math Visualization🔧Engineering🧪Chemistry

More from Chemistry

Other simulators in this category — or see all 65.

View category →
NewSchool

Water P–T Phase Diagram

Launch Simulator

Qualitative fusion, sublimation, vapor pressure up to critical point — probe labeled regions (pedagogical curves).

NewSchool

Binary Phase Diagram & Lever Rule

Launch Simulator

Isomorphous A–B T–x diagram: liquidus, solidus, tie line, and lever-rule phase fractions f_α and f_L for overall composition C₀.

NewSchool

Diffusion Couple (Fick's Second Law)

Launch Simulator

Infinite A|B diffusion couple: error-function concentration profiles, diffusivity D, time t, and diffusion length 2√(Dt).

NewSchool

Adsorption Isotherms

Launch Simulator

Langmuir, Freundlich, and BET isotherms: surface coverage, monolayer capacity n_m, and multilayer rise near P₀.

NewSchool

Close Packing FCC / BCC / HCP

Launch Simulator

Coordination numbers, maximal packing η, schematic ABC vs AB stacking beside a BCC cubic cell.

NewSchool

Chromatography Column

Launch Simulator

Partition chromatography cartoon: Gaussian bands separate as retention on the stationary phase differs.

PhysSandbox

Interactive physics, chemistry, and engineering simulators for students, teachers, and curious minds.

Physics

  • Classical Mechanics
  • Waves & Sound
  • Electricity & Magnetism

Science

  • Optics & Light
  • Gravity & Orbits
  • Astronomy & The Sky

More

  • Thermodynamics
  • Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience
  • Math Visualization
  • Engineering
  • Chemistry

© 2026 PhysSandbox. Free interactive science simulators.

PrivacyTermsContact
Home/Chemistry/Maxwell–Boltzmann vs Eₐ

Maxwell–Boltzmann vs Eₐ

Translational energy density f(E); shaded fraction above activation energy; compare Arrhenius exp(−Eₐ/RT).

Gas (translational)

400 K
50 kJ/mol

Measured values

P(E > Eₐ)0.000%
exp(−Eₐ/RT) (Arrhenius factor)2.9566e-7
P(E>Eₐ) / e^{−Eₐ/RT}4.517

About this model

This simulator plots the Maxwell–Boltzmann translational energy distribution f(E) for an ideal gas and shades the high-energy fraction of molecules with E > E_a. That tail is compared with the Arrhenius factor exp(−E_a/RT) that appears in many simple rate laws. Temperature T and activation energy E_a are the main controls: raising T fattens the tail so more molecules clear E_a even though the Arrhenius factor is only an approximate integral of the distribution. The model is classical ideal-gas kinetics with a sharp energy threshold; it ignores steric factors, tunneling, and detailed collision theory. You vary T and E_a to see why modest heating can accelerate reactions dramatically.

Who it's for: Introductory physical chemistry and chemical kinetics courses linking molecular speeds to Arrhenius behavior.

Key terms

  • Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution
  • Activation energy
  • Arrhenius equation
  • Energy distribution
  • Reaction rate
  • Thermal energy

How it works

Translational energy distribution for a classical ideal gas in 3D: f(E) ∝ √E exp(−E/kT). The shaded tail is the fraction of collisions with kinetic energy exceeding Eₐ per molecule (compare with the Arrhenius factor exp(−Eₐ/RT), which uses molar energies in reaction rate theory).

Key equations

f(E) = (2/√π)(kT)^(−3/2) √E exp(−E/kT)

P(E > Eₐ) = ∫_{Eₐ}^∞ f(E) dE

Frequently asked questions

Is the shaded fraction exactly equal to exp(−E_a/RT)?
No. The Arrhenius factor is a convenient approximation related to the high-energy tail, not a literal integral identity for every form of f(E). The simulator shows both so you can see they track similarly with T and E_a without being identical curves.
Why does a small temperature increase change the rate so much?
Only the far tail of f(E) lies above a typical E_a ≫ RT. That tail grows roughly exponentially with T, so rates often change by large factors for a few tens of kelvin. A misconception is that all molecules suddenly gain energy E_a; most remain below threshold.
Does this prove a reaction mechanism?
It only illustrates the kinetic idea that barrier crossing correlates with the energetic fraction of collisions. Real mechanisms need elementary steps, transition-state theory, and experimental rate laws; the plot is pedagogical gas-kinetic motivation for Arrhenius temperature dependence.