PhysSandbox
Classical MechanicsWaves & SoundElectricity & MagnetismOptics & LightGravity & OrbitsLabs
🌙Astronomy & The Sky🌡️Thermodynamics🌍Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience📐Math Visualization🔧Engineering🧪Chemistry

More from Chemistry

Other simulators in this category — or see all 55.

View category →
NewSchool

Unit Cell SC / BCC / FCC

Conventional cubic cells; yaw–pitch projection — lattice sites before basis detail.

Launch Simulator
NewUniversity / research

Sequential Stern–Gerlach

Two SG devices: P(up on SG₂) = cos²(θ/2) or sin²(θ/2) after |±z⟩ filter.

Launch Simulator
FeaturedKids

Molecule Viewer (3D)

Common molecules in 3D. Rotate, zoom. Ball-and-stick models.

Launch Simulator
FeaturedKids

Periodic Table

Click element for properties, electron config, and uses.

Launch Simulator
School

Electron Configuration

Fill orbitals visually with Aufbau principle animation.

Launch Simulator
School

Balancing Equations

Interactive practice. Drag coefficients. Check balance.

Launch Simulator
PhysSandbox

Interactive physics, chemistry, and engineering simulators for students, teachers, and curious minds.

Physics

  • Classical Mechanics
  • Waves & Sound
  • Electricity & Magnetism

Science

  • Optics & Light
  • Gravity & Orbits
  • Astronomy & The Sky

More

  • Thermodynamics
  • Biophysics, Fluids & Geoscience
  • Math Visualization
  • Engineering
  • Chemistry

© 2026 PhysSandbox. Free interactive science simulators.

PrivacyTermsContact
Home/Chemistry/Crystal Field Splitting (Oct / Tet)

Crystal Field Splitting (Oct / Tet)

In ligand field theory, an octahedral (O_h) environment splits the five degenerate d orbitals into a lower t₂g triplet and a higher e_g doublet with gap Δ_o; a tetrahedral (T_d) field inverts the pattern into a lower e doublet and upper t₂ triplet with gap Δ_t. For the same electrostatic point-charge model, Δ_tet = (4/9) Δ_oct. This page uses the standard relative one-electron energies (t₂g at −0.4Δ_o, e_g at +0.6Δ_o; e at −0.6Δ_t, t₂ at +0.4Δ_t) and adds a phenomenological pairing energy P per spin pair. High-spin (Hund) filling maximizes unpaired electrons before pairing within the energy-ordered set; low spin fills the lower subshell completely before occupying the upper set. For d⁴–d⁷ in octahedral symmetry, comparing E = CFSE + (#pairs)·P predicts the HS/LS crossover when Δ and P are varied. Tetrahedral gaps are smaller in the same model, so HS is often favored. The colored swatch maps Δ_oct to a toy hue for spectrochemical intuition only; real colors come from multiplet transitions, selection rules, and charge-transfer bands.

Who it's for: Inorganic chemistry after d-block introduction; pairs with orbital-shapes and electron-config pages.

Key terms

  • crystal field splitting
  • Δ_o
  • Δ_t
  • pairing energy
  • high spin
  • low spin
  • CFSE
  • spectrochemical series

Spectrochemical hint (toy)

Strong field (larger Δ) → shorter toy λ_d–d ~833 nm

d-orbital splitting

d_z²+0.6·Δ
d_x²−y²+0.6·Δ
Δ = 12000 cm⁻¹
d_xy-0.4·Δ
d_xz-0.4·Δ
d_yz-0.4·Δ

t₂g lower · e_g upper

HS vs LS energy (same n)

E_HS = 13200 cm⁻¹ · E_LS = 25200 cm⁻¹

HS lower — fewer pairs despite occupying upper orbitals.

d⁴–d⁷ in O_h are the usual HS/LS crossover cases; T_d often stays HS because Δ_t is smaller.

Crystal field

6
12000 cm⁻¹
18000 cm⁻¹

E = CFSE + (#pairs)·P in cm⁻¹; CFSE uses standard relative energies per electron in units of Δ_geom.

Measured values

Δ (splitting used)12000 cm⁻¹
4/9 ratio0.4444
CFSE (ground)-4800 cm⁻¹
Pairs (ground)1
Unpaired e⁻4
Ground labelHS

How it works

Octahedral (O_h) and tetrahedral (T_d) crystal fields split the five d orbitals into two sets with gap Δ. For the same ligand–metal model, Δ_tet = (4/9) Δ_oct. High spin (HS) vs low spin (LS) for d⁴–d⁷ compares pairing energy P with Δ: larger Δ (strong field / π-acceptor ligands) favors LS when it lowers CFSE + pairing. Color here is a toy map from Δ (spectrochemical intuition), not a ligand-field multiplet calculation.

Key equations

O_h: ε(t₂g) = −0.4Δ_o , ε(e_g) = +0.6Δ_o · T_d: ε(e) = −0.6Δ_t , ε(t₂) = +0.4Δ_t
Δ_t = (4/9) Δ_o (same point-charge model scaling)

Frequently asked questions

Why is Δ_t smaller than Δ_o in the 4/9 rule?
Fewer ligands (four vs six) and different angular overlap factors in the crystal-field model reduce the d-orbital splitting in tetrahedral symmetry relative to octahedral for comparable metal–ligand distances.
Does this include Jahn–Teller distortion or π-backbonding?
No. Those effects change orbital energies and gaps; this is a two-level crystal-field toy with a single adjustable Δ and a scalar P.
Is the color swatch quantitative?
No. It is a monotonic hue vs Δ_oct teaching aid. Experimental colors depend on ligands, oxidation state, geometry, and many overlapping transitions.